Cloning 4

Cloning Resources - FAQ

A resource for journalists, politicians, and anyone else who needs to understand the technical and ethical aspects of Human Cloning and Stem Cell Research.


Cloning Home

Press Releases

FAQ

Articles

News Items

Glossary of terms

Open Letter

Links

Contact Us

Frequently Asked Questions

David Perrin, National President, Australian Family Association, Tel. (03) 93265757

The Issue: In June 2002 the Federal government plans to introduce legislation to ban human cloning, but to allow scientists access to spare IVF embryos for the harvesting of embryo stem cells for medical research.

1. What are stem cells?

Stem cells are unprogrammed, unspecialised, master cells that can grow and change to make about 250 types of specialised cells, like heart cells, kidney cells, nerve cells, blood cells, skin cells, etc. There are two types of stem cells:

  • Embryo stem cells, found inside human embryos, are the master cells that grow into new tissues and organs at later stages of development. Some scientists want to experiment on embryonic stem cells, that are obtained by pulling apart the early embryo, destroying it in the process. This is highly UNETHICAL as it destroys a human life. While some scientists claim that embryo stem cells will provide cures for various diseases, these cells are medically dangerous. They can cause life-threatening tumors (see below).
  • Adult stem cells occur naturally in the developing baby, children and adults. They are found particularly in umbilical cord blood, as well as in bone marrow, the brain etc. They are proving to be medically safe, very successfully producing new tissues for treating various diseases (see below). Obtaining these repair master cells does not involve destroying human life. Their use is ETHICAL. Umbilical cords are now being collected and stored by the bone marrow bank associated with the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne.

2. If spare IVF embryos are going to die anyway, why not experiment on them for the good of humankind?

We do not allow doctors and scientists to experiment on dying human patients, and neither should we allow experiments on embryonic human beings on life support.

Under the Nuremberg Code of 1947 on "Permissible Medical Experiments":

  • "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential;
  • "The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury;
  • "No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects."

Indeed, a primary responsibility of government is to protect the weakest and most vulnerable, especially children.

The natural outcome for an embryo not in a womb is for it to die, just as the natural outcome for a person in the terminal stage of cancer or major heart disease is to die. Nature should be allowed to take its course, without scientists doing destructive experiments either on embryos or dying patients.

3. But is the embryo a person? Is it a human life? Don't a sperm and ovum have life also?

When a woman miscarries a pregnancy, the reaction of herself, her family and friends is to mourn the loss of a life. Many churches now hold annual ceremonies for women who have lost a pregnancy. A woman does not mourn the loss of hair at the hairdressers, or blood from a cut, or an egg at ovulation. All these have life, but are not of themselves a human life. Further, indications are that most women in the IVF program will not allow their embryos to be used for medical experimentation.

Scientifically, for a "biological life" to exist (plant, animal or human) it must fulfill four criteria: (1) Metabolism; (2) Growth; (3) Reaction to stimuli; and (4) Reproduction of the species. An embryo from the time of fertilisation fulfills these criteria. Hair, blood, sperm and eggs do not fulfill these criteria.

4. But we already accept 100,000 abortions a year. So what is the ethical difference between aborting embryos and experimenting on them?

To go from abortion to experimenting on live embryos is to go further down the slippery moral and ethical slope.

Where do we then draw the line? Scientists are already saying that they want to go much further. They want to create embryos only to destroy them in experiments. They want Australia to allow cloning of embryos for experimentation, or else we will fall behind other countries. Some want to clone human embryos using animal eggs and human DNA! If we let the scientists have their way, our society will go down the slippery ethical slope.

Adult Stem Cells: Safe, Ethical, Effective

Adult stem cells come from a patient's own tissue, or from compatible umbilical cord blood, and do not risk rejection by the patient. Adult stem cells, particularly umbilical cord blood stem cells, have produced many new regenerative medical treatments to help the suffering. Consider the following cases:

(For more examples, check our News page at left.)

  • A man in his mid-50s had been diagnosed with Parkinson's disease at age 49. The disease grew progressively, leading to tremors and rigidity in the patient's right arm. Traditional drug therapy did not help. Stem cells were harvested from the patient's brain using a routine brain biopsy procedure. They were cultured and expanded to several million cells. About 20 percent of these matured into dopamine-secreting neurons. In March 1999, the cells were injected into the patient's brain. Three months after the procedure, the man's motor skills had improved by 37 percent and there was an increase in dopamine production of 55.6 percent. One year after the procedure, the patient's overall Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale had improved by 83 percent - this at a time when he was not taking any other Parkinson's medication!
  • In Canada, younger multiple-sclerosis patients (MS) patients have greatly benefited from treatments using their own adult stem cells. (MS is an autoimmune disorder in which the patient's body attacks the protective sheaths that surround bundles of nerves.) Six months after the first patient was treated, she was found to have no evidence of the disease. Three other patients have also received successful adult-stem-cell grafts with no current evidence of active disease. It's too early to tell if the Canadian patients are in permanent remission.
  • Israeli doctors inserted a paraplegic patient's own white blood cells into her severed spinal cord, after which she regained bladder control and the ability to wiggle her toes and move her legs.
  • British scientists found that adult stem cells in bone marrow can turn into liver tissue, which can be used in new treatments for liver damage.
  • In the UK a three-year-old boy has been cured of a fatal disease using stem cells from his sister's placenta.
  • In February 2002, American scientists found that fat cells have the potential to be reprogrammed to turn into bone or cartilage cells.
  • In November of 2001 it was reported that human adult bone marrow stem cells can be grown in culture for extended periods of time and still retain the ability to differentiate into multiple cell types.
  • In July 2001 German doctors reported that a patient's own adult stem cells from bone marrow were used to regenerate tissue damaged by a heart attack.
  • Surgeons in Taiwan restored vision to patients with severe eye damage using stem cells from the patients' own eyes.
  • At Harvard University, mice with Type I diabetes were completely cured of their disease. The experiment was so successful that human trials are now planned.
  • Diabetic mice treated with adult stem cells achieved full insulin production and all lived. This is in contrast to an experiment in which embryonic stem cells injected into diabetic mice achieved a 3 percent insulin production rate and all the mice died.
  • In mice, stem cells from bone marrow have developed into brain cells and heart cells.

Embryonic Stem Cells can grow like tumors - Unsafe, Unethical, Unnecessary

Embryo stem cells have provided few, if any, direct medical treatments. Embryo stem cells have two serious difficulties in providing regenerative medical treatments: 1) embryo stem cells do not come from the patient and may be rejected by the patient's immune system, and 2) embryo stem cells are "unstable" and can grow like tumors.

  • In a report in January 2002 on the possibility that embryonic stem cells could treat Parkinson's disease in rats, 20% of rats injected with embryonic stem cells died from tumors formed in their brains. (L.M. Bjorklund et al.; "Embryonic stem cells develop into functional dopaminergic neurons after transplantation in a Parkinson rat model," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/99/4/2344 Jan 8, 2002).
  • Tumors formed from Embryo stem cells appear to malfunction as happens with some germ cells. Some of these cancerous growths can be fatal. One type of malformed tissue forms into dermoids - a solid, cystic ovarian mass that produces a mass of hair, teeth, cartilage, bone, etc.

So why do scientists want to experiment on embryo stem cells? Some pharmaceutical companies want to use them for testing new drugs.

More information at http://www.family.org.au/bioethics/cloning/